I need:
a) A list of every company that provides video service.
b) What they say their subscribers are.
c) An estimate as to the percentage of the country (by population) not served by any cable operator.
NCTA has a list of cable operators with customer bases down to a few thousand <a href="http://www.ncta.com/Organiz...">here</a>.
They don't think cable penetration is that high, though, even for basic cable. 109M households passed by cable, 65.4M households with basic cable. That's only 60+%
Latest info I can find from the Census Bureau has 113,155 households in the US in 2004.
NCTA's website claims 112M TV households as of June 2007, 109M of which are passed by cable.
http://www.ncta.com/Content...
Well, what do you want? Who's going to put public info on cable systems online, but a cable industry trade assn?
Is that 70% supposed to be for cable alone, or for all subscription services?
Because cable penetration has been dropping in favor of satellite. Nielsen substantiates the NCTA's cable numbers (68.3 million), noting that cable subscriptions have been dropping
If you count all subscription services, it's over 90% penetration in the TV market.
See http://www.tvb.org/rcentral...
It may be too late to have 70% cable penetration now that there are other, similar price/quality, delivery systems.
Nielsen's data shows that it was indeed over 70% a year or so ago, just not now.
Harold,
I haven't had time to try to compare the widely varying numbers being bandied about regarding the 70% penetration threshold, but one point I'd add that I haven't seen mentioned anywhere is:
“Homes passed” is often used to calculate subscriber penetration rates. My understanding is that “homes passed” is generally a measure of total “housing units,” not “households” (i.e., “occupied housing units”).
My understanding is that the FCC's 70% penetration rule is worded in a way that would apply to “households” rather than “homes passed.”
If I'm correct, then this means that “penetration” rates calculated against “homes passed” would understate the “penetration of households” by at least a few percentage points.
For example, if we assume an overall vacancy rate of 5%, a 54% penetration of “homes passed” equates to more than 61% of “households,” while a 68% penetration of “homes passed” equates to more than 71.5% penetration of “households.”
Oops...I meant 58% penetration of homes passed equates to more than 61% of households. 54% equates to nearly 57% of households.
Comments must be approved before being published.
Comments must be approved before being published.
Want to get updates when someone comments on this story?
Click here to manage subscription




Harold,
Can you post a list of questions that you would like answers to? Would a poll help (I think I can figure out how to put a poll up — although I know it would not be scientific --).
If we can come up with a short and sweet list of questions, I'll bet we can get some blogosphere love going to get some answers for you.