In the language of the U.S. military, [the soldier] has not been hardened. The infantry soldier is, as it were, a hairless, cowering ape, alone in the most lethal environment that human ingenuity has been able to conceive.The military wants to turn the hairless ape into a mechasoldier - lethal and hard to kill. The new suits should have “exomuscles” to amplify solders' strength, “kevlar on steroids” to make them bullet- and shrapnel-proof, biosensors galore, etc., etc. It sounds just like Starship Troopers, but sensitive and accurate waldoes seemed far-fetched when Heinlein first discribed them.
The truth is, no one knows whether such a suit can be made with current technology. The military is only looking for “proof of concept” within five years. Personally, I think they'll get that proof. The technology is moving quickly, and sometimes all it takes is a monetary nudge to bring a crazy idea from theory to practice.
“So I guess the most effective “protection” will be to prevent injuries to the extremeties (or at least, to stem the flow of blood from them.”
One thing on the wish list for the suit is automatic tourniquets.
Comments must be approved before being published.
Want to get updates when someone comments on this story?
Click here to manage subscription




I understand that since Napolean (i.e., since the dawn of large-scale mechanistic destruction), the extremities have by far been the site of the most common battlefield wounds. I believe the military typically analyzes battle risks in terms of casualties without distinguishing severity. So I guess the most effective “protection” will be to prevent injuries to the extremeties (or at least, to stem the flow of blood from them). Taken to the extreme, soldiers will be hired hands and legs. “Manpower” will be etymologically correct. (''The hand that powers.'')