Well, Harold:
I know we're not Wonkette, but couldn't we steer *just a little* in that direction for the duration of the McCain/Iseman story, in the interest of blogwhoring? No? Darn you! Integrity is such a downer!
Actually, I was asking for comment about what made the transaction controversial. Any further insight appreciated.
When I worked at Data General in the early 1980's, I had a dear friend, a pretty goodlooking woman a few years older than me, with whom I carpooled to work. Sometimes we went out to lunch together, and often we chatted during the workday. I'll confess that there might even have been a tad of sexual tension there between us. But there was never any flirting, sexual banter, touching, or Lord knows, sexual congress between us. I was a newly married man with an infant daughter! I did kiss her once: a peck on the cheek on her wedding day, when I wished her good luck.
I was dismayed years later when another colleague from those years mentioned how “everybody knew” that she and I were having an affair. “It was common knowledge in the office.” Oy.
Comments must be approved before being published.
Comments must be approved before being published.
Want to get updates when someone comments on this story?
Click here to manage subscription




The issue is not whether they %$#@ed each other, but if John McCain has been %$#@ing the American public in cohort with the lobbyists.
We do know that one of his lobbyist campaign employees is <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.t...">literally lobbying from his campaign bus</a>.