Pace Godwin, the idea that it's a good principle to indemnify corporations from law breaking when its done at the behest of the government is getting close to the definition of fascism --- the joining of corporate and government power, beyond the scope of law, in the name of national security.
[Obama] may genuinely think the legislation is good or just be afraid that the Republicans will use it against him. (I don't think that's going to help frankly --- he voted against it last time and that's all they need for the scare ads.) He does say that if he wins, he promises not to abuse the power it gives him, so I guess we should feel good about that.
I do know this: they would not have made this “compromise” and then brought this to the floor without his ok, and probably without his direction. He is the leader of the Democratic Party now, in the middle of a hotly contested presidential campaign. If he didn't come to them and say to get this thing done before the fall, then they came to him and asked his permission. That's just a fact. They aren't going to do anything he doesn't want them to do.
I don't have “buyer's remorse” because I never realy bought Obama. As I wrote on wetmachine some months ago, I voted for Chris Dodd in the primary, which occured a good while after he had dropped out of the race.
I did give an endorsement to Obama some weeks after I voted for Dodd, but that vote was based on Obama's opposition to an earlier version of this FISA abomination. Now Obama has gone back on his word, changed is opinion. My endorsement is hereby rescinded.
Here's my question for you, John. All Republican representatives save one voted for this FISA act. Do you support their position? I mean, the reason I detest Pelosi and Reid and now Obama is that they act like Republicans. I loathe Republican congressmen even more than I do these guys, who at least sometimes act like responsible patriots. That (acting like responsible patriots) is something that Republicans in congress never do. Or maybe one person does it here or there. But not the national figures — the Condi Rices and GWBushes and Karl Roves, etc.
After seven years of Bush, it's hard for me to comprehend how anybody of sound mind and possessed of a conscience can still call themselves a Republican. To be a Republican is to be a Bushite and Cheneyite. Which it tantamount to condoning treason.
[update: I edited this comment to make it a little less strident. I trust it's strident enough still.]
If Larry Lessig is right (see http://www.freepress.net/no...),
our elected officials vote like this because they serve not the public interest but the corporate interest. They serve the corporate interest because that's where the money is.
I don't see this as Obama's fault. At least his campaign refuses to accept contributions from corporate lobbyists and PACs.
Alan,
I agree that corporate money has a lot to do with this. But note: Obama has created a very productive grass roots money machine that enables him to do just fine, thank you very much, without the corporate dollars. So far, so good.
But here's the thing. Obama is the head of the Democratic Party. If he had put the word out “I hate this bill and I don't want it to pass. Anybody who wants to be remembered as a 'friend of Obama' when I'm in the White House will vote against it”, then it never would have passed. Either Digby is correct (and I think she is) and this bill has Obama's blessing, or else he's a wimp who doesn't know how to use his power as presidential nominee. In either case he gets from me the grade of F-. I might hold my nose and vote for him, but if the election were today I would vote for Bob Barr.
Now, I know that Barr has a smelly history as a rightwing zealot. I don't like the guy.
But when he says that Habeus is the bedrock on which all the whole edifice of our liberty is constructed, I believe him. And that counts for a lot.
Yesterday, in honor of the occasion, I wore my T-shirt from Don't Panic that reads:
do not assume your freedoms are assured
I usually wear it every July 4, but it seemed fitting.
A sobering “pragmatist's view” is here:
http://www.dailykos.com/sto...
It says that the 4th amendment is already dead, killed by the Patriot Act. So, no reason for Obama to fall on his sword over FISA.
Comments must be approved before being published.
Want to get updates when someone comments on this story?
Click here to manage subscription




Aaaaah buyers remorse. Don't know if it makes you feel any better but us Republicans aren't exactly overjoyed with our choice either. Fact I wasn't really that excited about any Republican choice during the primary run. Romney probably came closest to a pick but even he had warts. Ron Paul might be a decent choice from a position perspective but I don't like his Open Borders stance. No country can survive having its population double in 20 years with that kind of thinking.
Its another election year of the lesser of two bad choices.