I just turned 44, which kind of sucks, but as they say, it's better than the alternative. I think I've been old for a long long time, but now I have to admit it. Virtual World have been growing up, too, and my feelings are somewhat the same. Despite reports by Gartner and Forrester, articles in the Wall Street Journal, Business Week and Information Week, and even popular press like the LA Times, I still hadn't quite caught on to the idea that we now have an industry. But when I saw Christian Renaud's blog, I had to admit that “Virtual Worlds” is an industry category, and I'm in it. None of these articles are about the technology (what I do), but about what people do with it and how businesses make money with it. I guess it's better than the alternative. OK, it's pretty cool, but kind of weird. This stuff isn't household technology or household names yet. The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet. It's an interesting life-span inflection point.

I think we normally speak of work being done “in Powerpoint,” “in Word,” and so forth. This morning I looked at a transcript of people discussing virtual worlds while in one. The words “Qwaq” and “Forums” appear once each. The word “here” appears 49 times. We are finally getting to the point of having discussion about the results, not the technology. The program itself disappears, in just the same same way as we usually discuss being “at a Web-site” rather than “in Firefox” or “in Safari.” (Internet Explorer users may indeed reflect their tool's relative intrusion by thinking of their activity as being “in IE” more often.) [Read More!]

My last post referenced a movie of a “talk show” in Second Life, prompting John to ask about the relationship of avatar richness to the experience. I think there's a simple trick that's worth making explicit. [Read More!]

Here is some new-media content about Information Week's Mitch Wagner and Gartner's Steve Prentice vs SL's CFO and even Prokofy Neva. It is mostly about Second Life's power and problems and how that relates to others. Croquet's Qwaq Forums comes up a lot.

You can probably get out of this whatever you're predisposed to. (I took away that Geoffrey Moore is right.)

Do follow the link from there to the video. It's long and not densely packed, but it is a good tour of the non-technical state of virtual worlds — i.e., the things that matter to most of the world. Ten years from now, this is going to be how archaeologists remember today.

There's a photo of me in the current Information Week. Only it isn't a “photo,” and it isn't “me.” [Read More!]

[For ITF readers who haven't seen this on Wetmachine.]

In conjunction with Reporters without Borders, the Saatchi & Saatchi advertising firm is hosting a virtual demonstration Web event today to protest the imprisonment of more than 60 cyber-dissidents worldwide, and the thousands of jammed or blocked Web sites.

It's a sort of sub-2D affair, in which you can't communicate with other protestors or leave your permanent mark, although they do ask for your name.

Is Croquet a medium for individual interactions or group interactions? Both! [Read More!]

Another Croquet-based project has been launched this week. Cobalt is the first such coding project to be done by Duke University, which is also the home of the Croquet Consortium. [Read More!]

We seem to be wired to be able to solve difficult problems, but only in a community where we have support. To create that support, we have throughout history sung songs of heroes around the campfire. We are inspired by movies. Militaries breed close-knit groups and create splendid uniforms and other rituals. We go to church. With a support group, we overcome depression. We set our sports records before a stadium full of humans cheering us on.

Alone on Antarctic ice, we die.

[Read More!]

Lord help us. Microsoft is putting Windows on the OLPC box. Note the added memory.