These are individuals who over the past year (or over the course of their careers) have advanced the public interest regarding one of the three kinds of “IP.” While these increasingly overlapping policy arenas pose important challenges for us, they also create important opportunities for creative individuals in each of the three underlying fields to advance the public interest.Normally, this is where I would insert a rather broad hint that the labor of yr hmbl obdnt blogger and others in the realm of open spectrum would make me an excellent candidate for nomination. Fortunately, you are spared this outrageous and self-serving spectacle by the fact that I am actually judging the nominations this year. Accordingly, nary a word of encouragement that might suggest bias on my part shall pass my lips or make it to this public page.
Actually, I think I am eligible. But it would be rather bad form to beg. :)
I put Harold's name into the hat in a comment in the Public Knowledge blog. More comments would be helpful, I'm sure.
As I said in my comment, if there is a conflict between Harold's sitting on the committee and being nominated, I'm sure the good folks at Public Knowledge are smart enough to figure out a resolution.
Comments must be approved before being published.
Comments must be approved before being published.
Want to get updates when someone comments on this story?
Click here to manage subscription




ummmmmm . . . . does that mean you're ineligible for the nomination? or not? ;)